June 25, 2015 – Please join us in urging Congress to pass Senate Bill 349, the “Special Needs Trust Fairness Act of 2015.”
The bill, introduced by Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) earlier this year, is supported by the National Structured Settlements Trade Association (NSSTA), the Special Needs Alliance, the National Academy of Elder Law Attorneys, Easter Seals and The Arc.
What a difference a word can make.
The bill simply seeks to modify existing law by adding “the individual” to language identifying those who are capable of establishing a Special Needs Trust (SNT). When the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 was passed, a technical error resulted in excluding individuals from those able to create their own trust.
While there are certainly situations where disabled individuals cannot create their own trust, allowing those who are fully capable eliminates an unnecessary complexity to the process of establishing a Special Needs Trust.
Our firm is frequently involved in coordinating benefits with Special Needs Trust beneficiaries who can benefit from the power of Special Needs Trusts combined with structured settlement benefits.
We applaud Sem. Grassley for his ongoing leadership and look forward to this bill becoming law.
Image courtesy of Vichaya Kiatying-Angsulee at FreeDigitalPhotos.net.
June 18, 2015 – So you’ve saved a bunch of money during your working life and are finally getting serious about making some decisions about how to make sure this gob of money lasts for as long as you do.
Maybe you’re lucky and worked for an employer that still offered a pension.
Social Security or its public employee equivalent or both will cover some of your future needs.
But in addition, you have this lifetime accumulated mass (larger for some, smaller for others) of dollars you need to stretch out over your golden years.
What do you do with your money?
Who can you believe?
If you put any stock into recent research by someone qualified to speak intelligently on the topic, you might want to read the latest coming out of the Mercatus Center at George Mason University.
Government Policy on Distribution Methods in Individual Accounts for Retirees: Life Income Annuities and Withdrawal Rules is an excellent Working Paper, authored by visiting scholar Mark J. Warshawsky, PhD.
The paper gives additional support to the long-standing (but frequently maligned by the financial planning community) notion that many people can benefit by choosing life annuities to meet some portion of their overall retirement income needs.
“The life annuity is indeed an effective instrument for distributing retirement assets to produce lifetime income; it functions generally somewhat better than the withdrawal rules in widespread use.”
The paper itself is chock full of supportable reasons why it might make sense for you to give annuities serious consideration for some of your retirement funds.
Assuming you’re not a policy wonk inclined to read the 48 page findings cover to cover, this summary by RealDealRetirement.com editor Walter Updegrave which appeared in yesterday’s online edition of CNNMoney gives a good common sense perspective:
For the record, we’re completely on board with the “don’t put all your (nest) eggs in one basket” approach to retirement income planning.
As such, we just think that locking up some portion of your money to make sure it lasts for the rest of your life regardless of how long you live makes too much retirement sense to overlook.
It’s always reassuring when we come across supportable information that reinforces something we’ve been telling clients for years.
Annuities, whether it be through a structured settlement, structured attorney fee, structured sale or simple retirement fund rollover, just seem to simplify the whole idea of taking care of your future needs for so many people.
Image courtesy of Stuart Miles at FreeDigitalPhotos.net
Truth be told, there are probably about 535 connections and you can find them all in Washington, DC every so often.
It turns out, in this city where consensus among Democrats and Republicans seems rarer than an awards show where Taylor Swift doesn’t walk away with at least one trophy, the two parties have discovered a few areas where common ground is possible irrespective of party allegiance:
Taylor Swift and Structured Settlements
As reported by CNN Senior Digital Correspondent Chris Moody and elsewhere, DC politicians have found a bipartisan interest in this summer’s Taylor Swift concert tour.
Some things are so undeniably good that one’s political party affiliation just doesn’t matter.
Take structured settlements, for instance. Since their inception more than three decades ago, structured settlements have always enjoyed broad bipartisan support throughout both chambers of Congress.
As this joint statement of the American Association of People with Disabilities and the National Structured Settlements Trade Association makes clear, the legislative history of structured settlements is awash with names of some of history’s most distinguished political leaders supporting this great settlement option.
If elections were being held today for someone tasked with bridging divides and uniting the masses, Taylor Swift would easily get my vote. Her unique ability to connect with people of all ages, sizes, shapes and genders makes her the perfect candidate.
In a way, you might even say she’s the personification of a structured settlement!
To be clear, I have no reason to believe Taylor Swift even knows what a structured settlement is so there really isn’t any direct connection between the two.
But with this phenomenal artist’s uncanny and well demonstrated history of showing compassion and concern for those who are suffering, I have to believe she’d be a fan of them if she knew how much they helped people.
Taylor, if you’re reading this, hopefully you can shake, shake, shake off any liberties I’ve taken in riding your coattails. All the best with your upcoming tour and please feel free to reach out if you’re interested in learning more about structured settlements.
I promise to never, ever, ever invoke your name in one of my blog posts again.
(Unless, of course, you want me to)
Image of US Capitol Building courtesy of Vichaya Kiatying-Angsulee at FreeDigitalPhotos.net
From our May 28, 2015 Newsletter
With the structured settlements industry recently concluding its best first quarter since the Great Recession officially ended six years ago, 2015 is shaping up to be a banner year for successful utilization of this proven settlement option and claims resolution tool that helps so many.
Wonder what’s driving this upward trend?
Probably no single answer; however, a few surveys provide insights into some possibilities while simultaneously highlighting the perceptions of those engaged in the litigation resolution process.
A report prepared by Prudential Global Strategic Research in conjunction with Prudential Structured Settlements seeks to compare and contrast claimants’ views on these two settlement options.
(Full disclosure: I serve on Prudential’s Structured Solutions Leadership Council which convenes regularly to discuss topics of mutual interest as a service to the industry)
“Understanding Structured Settlements” – Authored by Kevin Silo and Taylor Smith for the May, 2015 issue of Claims Management, this article reveals the results of a survey conducted to gauge perceptions of front line claims professionals about structured settlements.
(Full disclosure: I am a Fellow of the Claims & Litigation Management Alliance and past president of the National Structured Settlements Trade Association (NSSTA), which commissioned this survey through CLM Advisors)
NSSTA conducted a survey of plaintiff attorneys to better understand how they feel about structured settlements and when they are most likely to recommend them. For your convenience, we’ve uploaded a copy of the survey to the Finn Financial Group YouTube Channel.
(Full disclosure: I never seriously considered attending law school once I learned calculators were not involved)
BONUS TRUTH: 80% of attorneys who structured their attorney fees did so for retirement planning purposes.
Individually and collectively, these three surveys lead to one irrefutable truth: ALL three major stakeholders to the litigation process – claimants, claims professionals and plaintiff attorneys – hold very positive views about the use of structured settlements.
We don’t need a survey to tell us that’s pretty good news!
We do, however, hope you enjoy looking at these surveys and will call us if you have any questions or wish to learn more on any topics discussed.
Thank you for the opportunity to be of service and best wishes for continued success in your personal and professional lives.
Survey images courtesy of Stuart Miles at FreeDigitalPhotos.net
April 15, 2015 – Yesterday was a great day for annuities!
According to a report in InvestmentNews, Ken Fisher is leaving the building.
You may have never heard of Ken Fisher but you’d be hard pressed to miss him if you’ve ever spent any time on Google trying to figure out what to do with your retirement money.
He’s the guy who goes around saying (and presumably paying decent money for ad space to have him quoted saying) “I Hate Annuities” and beseeching others to do the same.
When you’ve dedicated your professional life to helping people using various types of annuities to improve their lives as I have and understand firsthand how valuable they can be, it’s hard not to be offended but such an antagonistic statement.
“Hate” is a very strong word. Most of our parents and teachers frowned upon our usage of it when we were children.
Negative advertising and fearmongering must work, though, and I’m sure those ads directed more than a few people to Fisher’s $60 billion money management firm.
For that reason alone, he shouldn’t hate annuities. He should love them!
Don’t get me wrong. I don’t begrudge him the success of his advisory firm one bit.
And even though it’s not the focus of our practice, you’ll never catch me unilaterally advocating against actively managed funds or passively invested mutual funds. They obviously have a place in the financial planning discussion.
But so do annuities and Fisher knows this. Or should.
I take issue, however, with anyone who uses incendiary half-truths and red herrings to cast aspersions on an entire industry that serves such a public good. Especially when I’m suspicious of that person’s motives.
Hopefully, the investing public is smart enough see this tactic as the self-serving sleight of hand that it is.
When a guy like Ken Fisher says he hates annuities, people would be well advised to be doubtful.
If fictitious oil baron J.R. Ewing said he hated solar energy, wouldn’t you feel you intuitively understood why?
Eventually, possibilities become clearer for those who look under the surface to explore what else might be driving the negative sentiment.
A quick trip to the calculator reveals that if Fisher could capture even a fraction of the $2.36 trillion in annual annuity purchases made over the past decade as reported by LIMRA Secure Retirement Institute, it would be a hefty boost to his personal net worth.
According to the authors of the scholarly Rational Decumulation, annuities are one of the most cost effective and least risky asset classes for generating retirement income for life. They have been around since the Roman Empire and they’re not going away anytime soon.
If the InvestmentNews report is accurate, the same cannot be said for Ken Fisher.
And those of us annoyed by his audacious ads won’t mourn his departure.
Image courtesy of bplanet at FreeDigitalPhoto.net
April 1, 2015 – Although most of our clients have come to think of the Finn Financial Group as the people who help them meet their 21st century future financial security needs, it is with great pride that we pause today to pay tribute to our firm’s original founding father who, on this day in 1752, originated the concept that would grow to be known as a structured settlement.
When my 6th great-grandfather Benjamin Franklin, in his spare time and before his foray into starting a new country, founded the Philadelphia Fire, Life and Structured Settlements Company, he did so with the noblest of intentions. He wanted to do something that would, according to his will, “secure the blessings of financial security to (him)self and (his) posterity” in hopes that his many offspring and their descendants would be properly taken care of.
With that simple mission, he allocated a portion of his wealth to be set aside in such a way that, upon his death, it could be “structured to settle the meants which are and of Right ought to be . . . totally dissolved” and to “thereafter pay sums in perpetuity or until death, whichever comes first, with the interest therein earned” for all his descendants known and unknown.
“Meants” were the 18th century colloquial term for “intents” of those who had borrowed money. Today, we would call these debts.
Fearing overexposure, GB6 (6th great-grandpa Ben as we call him around the shop these days) didn’t want his new “structured settlemeant” firm to bear his name but did want to have at least some noticeable, if obscure, affiliation to its founding.
Upon arrival at the Fifth Continental Congress, he lamented, “Curse this rankling gout! Would that I could extract it from my surname and live in peace like the nobles I despise but strive to emulate.”
He paused, and then smiled realizing what had just occurred.
Then and there, in a rare display of humility but with typical ironic humor and quite by accident, he took the “rankl” out of F-rankl-in, added an extra “n” (in deference to William Penn whose hat he always coveted) and opened the doors to Ye Olde Finn Financial Structured Settlemeant and Annuity Shoppe.
Needing to take leave of the Congress to go next door to fill out the articles of incorporation for his new venture, he asked a young Virginia delegate tasked with drafting what he thought was the luncheon menu to mind his papers until he returned. Only later would he realize he had neglected to remove a copy of his will from his satchel which was liberally borrowed from by Thomas Jefferson in creating something that was not a luncheon menu after all.
So please join us in celebrating our 263rd year in offering structured settlements and specialty annuity products and services. We’re proud to be of service to you and look forward to our next 263 years!
(PS Dedicated to my friend, structured settlement mentor and world’s best practical joker Bob Kringlie for whom April 1 – our firm’s actual first day in 2009 – was considered a national holiday)
March 16, 2015 – Demonstrating that good news often travels in threes, I’m pleased to unfurl the attached triad of recent links which point to “smooth sailing” for the life insurance industry in 2015:
When people enter into life insurance or annuity contracts, they are buying promises that future financial risks they face will be properly addressed.
As these three independent rating agencies look ahead, they offer assurance to policyholders that their promise is well placed.
Even when local, national or global events conspire to test that promise, as was the case during The Great Recession, the industry as a whole fared exceptionally well.
A United States Government Accountability Office (GAO) report on the “Insurance Markets – Impacts of and Regulatory Response to the 2007-2009 Financial Crisis” reveals:
“(t)he effects of the financial crisis on insurers were generally limited . . . .”
Life insurers, with the exception of the variable market (which our firm doesn’t offer), fared especially well.
The structured settlement and retirement annuity companies we are proud to represent have long histories of honoring their promises and making their payments on time.
So if you want to increase your chances that your money will be there in the future when you need it, know that if you choose a highly rated life insurance annuity, you’ll be choosing something that has weathered many storms and is still solidly afloat.
(Image courtesy of Stuart Miles of FreeDigitalPhotos.net)
March 2, 2015 -With Superbowl XLIX recently concluded, if you played for the New England Patriots, CONGRATULATIONS!
Earning a Superbowl ring puts you in very elite company.
With the 87th Academy Awards now behind us, if you were among the select few to take home an Oscar, CONGRATULATIONS!
You own a rare piece of hardware.
If you’ve made the decision to use a portion of your retirement savings to purchase annuities, CONGRATULATIONS!
A host of prominent economists, including several Nobel Prize winners, agree you have made a smart retirement choice.
You are definitely ahead of the curve! (Pun intended)
Smart Folks Here
While it’s a safe bet that fewer people read American Economic Review than watch the Superbowl or the Oscars, those who did read one particular article from about a decade ago derive something far more important than the fleeting entertainment value the first two diversions bring.
Using formulae and language only a calculus student could love, “Annuities and Individual Welfare” demonstrates that economists, who rarely agree on anything, all seem to agree that annuities make the most sense for most people.
And lest you think this is a bunch of life company propaganda, consider the collective brain power coming together to agree “annuitization of a substantial portion of retirement wealth is the way to go.”
Those holding this belief are economists from some of the world’s most prestigious centers of higher learning, including:
The Wharton School, Berkeley, Chicago,
Yale, Harvard, London Business School, Illinois,
Hebrew University, Carnegie Mellon, MIT
Reluctance to Jump In
Most of us intuitively understand the retirement wealth accumulation process: Save money. Invest it. Hope it grows.
But when it comes time for Decumulation, people just can’t seem to make the shift from a lifetime habit of acquiring to one of “dequiring.”
Those who can make this transition will benefit greatly.
In their article “Investing your Lump Sum at Retirement,” Wharton Financial Institutions Center Fellows Babbel and Merril reinforce the finding that:
” . . . full annuitization was optimal for people who had no desire to leave a bequest to their heirs or charitable organizations.
It also concluded that for those with bequest motives, substantial annuitization of retirement wealth was still the most prudent way to act.” (Emphasis ours)
Ironically, those with the greatest wealth are the ones who stand to benefit the most from annuitization.
Not because they have the most wealth to begin with but rather because their percentage of assets dedicated to guaranteed lifetime income cash flows (i.e. Social Security) is much smaller.
When the Chairman of the Federal Reserve discloses, as Ben Bernanke did in 2010, that the bulk of his retirement portfolio consists mostly of two annuities, it’s definitely noteworthy.
If the person overseeing the entire central banking system of the United States chooses such a no-frills retirement allocation, maybe it can serve as a clue to the rest of us that annuities are a pretty smart, safe bet.
So why not join the chorus?
“Say YES to annuities!”
Image courtesy of digitlart at FreeDigitalPhotos.net
February 16, 2015 – If you’re off work today here in the United States, it may surprise you to know that it’s not because Presidents Day is a federal holiday since no such holiday exists.
5 USC § 6103(a) does, however, make Washington’s Birthday, celebrated the third Monday of each year, a federal holiday.
As presidents go, George Washington usually ranks among the top five all time in terms of overall net worth. Not all presidents were so lucky with their fortunes.
In fact, about 20% of our nation’s chief executives experienced insolvency at one time or another in their lifetimes.
Who knew the position was fraught with such a high chance of financial insecurity?
One famous founding father whose age was likely the only thing preventing him from becoming president was Benjamin Franklin. Ranking No. 181 on the all-time richest people ever list, Franklin did pretty well for himself and his heirs moneywise.
Franklin was 83 at the time of Washington’s inauguration, 26 years older than our first president.
In addition to passing a significant amount of property and valuable personal possessions to his heirs, Franklin’s last will and testament laid out some pretty detailed annuity requirements.
The one for his sister, Jane Mecom, was a rather straightforward “fifty (later increased to sixty) pounds sterling . . . to be paid to her annually” annuity in addition to the house he bequeathed her.
The annuities left to the cities of Boston and Philadelphia for schooling, hospitals and apprenticeships were a little more creative and specific. And they were set up to run for 200 years. Now THAT’s forward thinking!
Unlike Washington, who married into his fortune, Franklin’s wealth was a result of his own initiative.
And you can bet a man who preached that “a penny saved is a penny earned” understood the value of the time value of money. No doubt this belief influenced his annuity decisions.
Perhaps helps explain why most people would rather have a Benjamin than a George.
Image courtesy of Gualberto107 at FreeDigitalPhotos.net
February 15, 2015
Are you among the 76 million people born between 1946 and 1964?
Worked most of your adult life?
Have some money sitting in a 401(k) or similar retirement account?
Want to make sure it lasts the rest of your life?
If you answered yes to any of these questions and are retired or within a decade or so of retiring, there’s a good chance you could benefit greatly by converting some of your nest egg into some type of annuity.
But there’s an even better chance you will never do so.
Even though annuities have been shown to be “the most cost-effective and least risky asset class for generating guaranteed retirement income for life,” people still resist buying them.
They’re safe. They’re secure. They’re practical.
And They WORK!
To gain insight into this paradox, Forbes has a brief slide show that does a pretty good job identifying the “8 Reasons Retirees Don’t Buy Annuities.”
No reason for you to be one of “those” people. When you’re ready to put the “I” in your retirement, give us a call to let us help you decide whether or not a retirement annuity makes sense for you.
BONUS INFO: By the way, contrary to rhetoric espoused by many in the financial planning community, annuities and traditional investing can co-exist very nicely.
In fact, when you address your non-discretionary retirement cash flow needs with annuities, you take a lot of pressure off your portfolio (and yourself) to constantly perform at an unsustainably high level.
Owning annuities allows you to better absorb the market ups and downs, reducing the chance you’ll make panicky moves which could leave you in a weakened long term financial position.
Image courtesy of hyena reality at FreeDigitalPhotos.net